Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Rathkopf

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 27, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

The petitioners are sons of the decedent and are named as substitute executors in the propounded instrument in the event that the executor named therein pre*105deceased the testatrix. The petition recites that the executor named in the propounded instrument died prior to or simultaneously with the testatrix.

The issue presented is whether the substitute executors named in the propounded instrument are entitled to qualification if the executor named in the propounded instrument died simultaneously with the testatrix. If the propounded instrument merely stated that the substitute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of Last Will & Testament of HealyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. In re Proving the Will of CornellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ZalaznickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
  2. In re the Estate of KruesiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  3. In re the Estate of BurdickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of DrubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  5. In re the Estate of FishmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API