Legal Opinion

Pugliese v. Nelson

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 4, 1980No. Nos. 419-421, Dockets 79-2136, 79-2138 and 79-2140PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

This appeal raises the question of whether the Due Process Clause mandates procedural safeguards before the United States Bureau of Prisons may designate an inmate as a “Central Monitoring Case” (CMC). W. Raymond Nelson, Warden of the Federal Correctional Institution at Danbury, Connecticut, appeals from judgments of the District Court for the District of Connecticut, entered by Judge Ellen B. Burns in May, 1979, granting the petitions of three inmates of that institution, Frank Pugliese, John Bazzano and Leonard Durso, for writs of habeas corpus seeking termination…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Victory v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Marcus T. Baumann v. Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Fisher v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
  5. Romer v. MorgenthauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API