Legal Opinion
Angulo v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 19, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant City of New York appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), entered December 26, 2006, as denied that branch of its motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to timely serve a notice of claim and granted the plaintiffs cross motion pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to deem his notice of claim timely served, nunc pro tunc.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Brown v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Rosenbaum v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Laroc v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Maxwell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zaid v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Argudo v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- STOECKLEY v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bertolotti v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Chauhan v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010