Legal Opinion

Klaus v. Klaus

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1941No. Appeal, 50PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The parties to this divorce action were married in 1925 and lived together until January 10, 1936 when respondent left libellant taking their young son with her. They have not lived together since that date. The principal difficulty between them and the reason for the separation was an “affair” extending over a number of years between libellant and a Mrs. Davis. The master recommended a divorce. The lower court, though it found that libellant had “paid undue attention to Mrs. Davis” and, after the separation, “did not change his conduct in that respect,” nevertheless…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mertz v. MertzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Angier v. AngierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Pomerantz v. PomerantzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Manzi v. ManziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Crandall v. CrandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Watt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Lowe v. LoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Cowher v. CowherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cartmell v. CartmellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Clark v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API