Legal Opinion

Manice v. Randolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.

Plaintiff and defendant were married in this State. They have a son sixteen years old. They were divorced in Maine in May, 1919. Since then plaintiff has maintained and supported the child. She has expended $7,500 on this account. She now sues for that sum with interest on one-half from June, 1923.

It was decided in a very early holding that “ A parent is under a natural obligation to furnish necessaries for his infant children; and if the parent neglect that duty, any other person who supplies such necessaries is deemed to have conferred a benefit on the delinquent parent, for which the law…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Laumeier v. . LaumeierNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Van Valkinburgh v. WatsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Bennett v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Dumay v. DumayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morris v. BirminghamAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932
  2. Clarke v. ClarkeNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Okun v. OkunNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Sharp v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
  5. Ebstein v. SaxenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API