Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brubaker v. Gould

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 5, 1962No. Gen. 48,354Published

1DissentJustice English

One paragraph of the majority opinion sets forth two principles of law as governing the chancellor in his determination of defendants’ motion for a finding in their favor at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence. These two principles are:

Rule (1). It was the duty of the court to weigh the evidence. (This statement is in recognition of Section 64(5) of the Civil Practice Act which provides: “In ruling on the motion the court shall weigh the evidence.”)

Rule (2). It was the duty of the court to consider whether there was any evidence, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom, tending to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. LandfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Mitchell v. Van ScoykIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Allendorf v. DailyIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Peters v. CattIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Jorgensen v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API