Legal Opinion
Converse, Kennett & Co. v. E. Hill & Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 15, 1859PublishedCited by 6 opinions
PPEAL from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans, Price, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
The plaintiffs, judgment creditors of defendant, caused certain merchandise to be seized and sold by the Sheriff, under a writ of fieri facias issued on their judgment.
Letchford & Co., Haggerty & Co. and Gould & Co. filed third oppositions and claimed the proceeds of sale in the hands of the Sheriff, on the grounds, that they were the unpaid vendors of the merchandise sold, and had a privilege on the proceeds superior to that of plaintiffs.
The facts are not disputed, that the third opponents are the vendors of the goods, and that the price is unpaid. The plaintiffs oppose their claims in…
2Cited by6 opinions
- In Re TrahanDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1968
- South Street Lumber Company v. DickersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Bulova Watch Co. v. NoblesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Pollock Paper Box Co. v. CrosbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- Security Bank v. Natl. Mutual Assurance Assn.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.