Legal Opinion
Amax Coal Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 1, 1980No. Nos. 78-2310, 78-2489PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This case is before the Court upon the petitions of Amax Coal Company, a division of Amax, Inc., (Amax or the Company) and the United Mine Workers of America (the Union or UMWA) to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board (the Board). The Board found that the Union violated the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq., (the Act) by threatening to strike and by striking to coerce Amax into bargaining through a multi-employer group; by refusing to meet and bargain separately with Amax before February 3,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Arroyo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gustave D. Toensing v. E. A. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barr Laboratories, Inc. v. Quantum Pharmics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Feather v. United Mine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- LONE STAR STEEL COMPANY v. United Mine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1986
- Amax Coal Company, a Division of Amax, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Mine Workers of America, Local No. 1854, and United Mine Workers of America, Intervenors. United Mine Workers of America, Local No. 1854 and United Mine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Amax Coal Company, a Division of Amax, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980