Legal Opinion

Glascock v. Lemp

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1901No. 3,385PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Erom the Eountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

An action in replevin by appellant as plaintiff against appellee as defendant, to recover the possession of a mare, and damages for her detention. The issues were joined by an answer in denial and the cause tried by the court. Upon proper request, the court made a special finding of facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon. By its conclusions of law, the court held that appellant could not recover. Appellant excepted to the conclusions of law, and the assignment of errors challenges such conclusions. Appellee has not filed any brief.

The court specially found that appellant was the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holderman v. ManierIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Tewksbury v. BronsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Roberts v. JacksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
  4. Tucker v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Ruggles v. WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Reardon v. HigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Turner v. HortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Vaught v. KnueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Kent v. Muscatine, North & South Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API