Legal Opinion

Ambrosino v. Transoceanic Steamship Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 19, 1982No. Nos. 3, 811, Dockets 80-7554, 81-7808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

These two appeals are by longshoremen injured aboard ship during the course of their employment; they seek damages from the shipowners under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., for their personal injuries. The sole issue presented to us is whether the September 9, 1977 amendments to the Code of Federal Regulations, 20 C.F.R. §§ 702.312 and .315, mandate a result on these cases different from the one we reached in Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co. Ltd., 617 F.2d 955 (2nd Cir. 1980), aff’d, 451 U.S. 596, 101 S.Ct. 1945, 68 L.Ed. *4712d 472 (1981). We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Frederico Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co. Ltd. And Djakarta Lloyd, P.N.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Francesco Verderame v. Torm Lines, A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ramon Costa v. Danais Shipping Company and Kratigos Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Louis D'Amico v. Cia De Nav. Mar. NetumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Rother v. Interstate and Ocean Transport Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Antonio Ambrosino v. Transoceanic Steamship Co., Ltd. v. Giacomo Circolone and Cross Caruso, Third-Party Louis Cigliano v. Empressa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Williamson v. The M/V Sandra WeschDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API