In re the Personal Restraint of Jackson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
González, J.
fl Petitioners Ronnie Jackson Jr. and Salvador Rivera filed personal restraint petitions to challenge the firearm enhancements they received as part of their sentences, which became final in 2002. In response, we must decide if the rules we announced in State v. Recuenco, 154 Wn.2d 156, 110 P.3d 188 (2005) (Recuenco I) and State v. Recuenco, 163 Wn.2d 428, 180 P.3d 1276 (2008) (Recuenco III) apply retroactively. The rules in question are (1) that a firearm enhancement cannot be based on a jury’s general “deadly weapon” finding, see Recuenco I, 154 Wn.2d at 162; Recuenco III, 163…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. TheroffWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of GentryWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- In re the Personal Restraint of NethertonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Pers. Restraint of GentryWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- In re Pers. Restraint of NethertonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State Of Washington v. Bryan HartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.