Kaplan v. O'KANE
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in favor of Appellee Colleen O’Kane following a jury’s verdict that Appellant Laurence Kaplan did not suffer a serious impairment of bodily function as a result of a motor vehicle accident occurring on October 24, 1992. On appeal, Appellant contends (1) the trial court should have granted Appellant’s post-trial motion for a new trial on the basis that Appellee’s counsel intentionally informed the jury that Appellant was subject to limited tort, and (2) the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Siegal v. StefanyszynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- McMillen v. 84 Lumber, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Allied Electrical Supply Co. v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Factor v. Bicycle Technology Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
3Cited by8 opinions
- Renninger, D. v. A & R Machine ShopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Love-Diggs v. TirathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Suburban West AbstractorsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Brown v. Sloane, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2011
- Burnley, D. v. Loews HotelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.