Legal Opinion

McMillen v. 84 Lumber, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1994PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

The issue presented by this appeal concerns the scope of the exception to the rule that issues not timely raised before the trial court are waived. Because we think that the exception is, and must be, considerably more narrow than construed by the Superior Court, we reverse that court’s grant of a new trial in the instant case.

Appellees, the McMillens, commenced a products liability action in 1987 against Appellant, Enterprise Companies, Inc., and other defendants, for injuries suffered by Mr. McMillen when he inhaled fumes from a wood stain manufactured…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. McKennaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Tagnani v. LewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Takes v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Miller v. St. Luke's Univ. Health NetworkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Factor v. Bicycle Technology Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Kaplan v. O'KANESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API