Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ogino v. Black

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1951Published

1DissentVak Voorhis, J.

The first and second affirmative defenses plead the exclusiveness of the New York State Workmen’s Compensation Law. The third defense alleges that the Workmen’s Compensation Law of North Carolina is exclusive. The statutes of both States are invoked by defendant inasmuch as, until the evidence is adduced at the trial, there is uncertainty concerning whether either or both of said statutes apply. Under the majority opinion of this court the defense based upon the North Carolina Act is allowed *151to stand, whereas the defense based upon the Workmen’s Compensation Act of New York State is being…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blaine v. Huttig Sash & Door Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Culhane v. Economical Garage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Mangiaracino v. Laclede Steel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API