Coustaline v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
By the WHOLE COURT.
ST. PAUL, J.
I think the writ should be denied.
The decision of the Court of Appeal in this case is not in conflict with the decision of this court in McHenry Horse Exchange v. Illinois Central R. R. Co., 148 La. 49, 86 South. 649.
Certainly the bill of lading is binding (within limits) between the carrier on one side, and the shipper (and consignee) on the other.
But that presupposes that the provisions thereof relied upon by either party must be lawful. For instance, the shipper cannot invoke a provision calling for a freight rate lower than that fixed by the published…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McHenry Horse Exchange v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Empacadora De Ciudad Juarez, S.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Gardner v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934