Legal Opinion

Masik v. Lutheran Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*733Despite the failure of the defendant Nawaiz Ahmad to appear for a court-ordered deposition, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to impose the drastic remedy of striking his answer (see CPLR 3126 [3]; Deans v Jamaica Hosp. Med. Ctr., 64 AD3d 744 [2009]; see also Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654 [2010]; Novick v DeRosa, 51 AD3d 885 [2008]). Skelos, J.E, Leventhal, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Motion by the defendant Nawaiz Ahmad to dismiss an appeal from an order dated June 4, 2010, on the ground that it has been rendered academic.

Upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pirro Group, LLC v. One Point Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Novick v. DeRosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Masik v. Lutheran Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Deans v. Jamaica Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pipelias v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Pipelias v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API