Legal Opinion

Lindgren v. Marraffa

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 8, 1966PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.

These are actions of tort for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate allegedly resulting from the negligent operation of the defendants’ motor vehicles. The cases were tried together before a jury in the Superior Court. Upon conclusion of the evidence, the trial judge allowed motions by the defendants for a directed verdict to which the plaintiff excepted.

We summarize the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff. The defendant Marraffa was driving a truck eighteen feet in length. He waited in a crossover to move into the line of westbound traffic. The crossover was an opening of nearly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Mercier v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Rizzittelli v. VestineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Falvey v. HamelburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Jacobs v. MonizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Halley v. Hugh Nawn, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. Romano v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. Rivkin v. Monsanto Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  4. Cossart v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Garcia v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API