Hudson v. Indiana Limestone Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED ENTRY ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARKER, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
This is a sex harassment and retaliation case. The Plaintiff Mary Jane Hudson alleges that her supervisor at her place of work, Indiana Limestone Company, Inc., sexually harassed her and that, after she complained of the harassment, she was discharged from employment in retaliation for having complained.
The case is before the Court on Indiana Limestone’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its counter-claim, which raises a dispositive threshold matter. Indiana Limestone claims that Hudson signed a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.