Legal Opinion

Ryner v. Duke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1950No. 16862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) A judgment may be arrested only for defects not amendable, appearing on the face of the record. Code, § 110-702. If a judgment can be arrested it is always void. Chapman v. Taliaferro, 1 Ga. App. 235, 238 (58 S. E. 128). Our former decision (Ryner v. Duke, 205 Ga. 280), shows that the trial court was deprived of jurisdiction after the verdict of the jury had conclusively eliminated both of the resident defendants. Since neither of those defendants nor the petitioner has excepted to that verdict, it has become the law of the case,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Southern Airlines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Chapman v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Ryner v. DukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wasden v. Rusco Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Henry v. MannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API