Legal Opinion

Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 14, 2006No. 97-21CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. (CST) and Sanford M. Stevenson (Mr. Stevenson) seek compensation from the United States, under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), for the unlawful use of two of their patents — U.S. Patent No. 4,749,497 (the ’497 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 5,370,800 (the ’800 patent)— both of which relate to the treatment of waste water. In this opinion, the third in a series, the court analyzes whether the government unlawfully used the patents at the Summitville Mine site in southern Colorado, and thereby owes plaintiffs damages. After carefully considering the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  5. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API