Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1985No. 10-84-01540; CA A33013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree theft. We reverse, because the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to an invalid search warrant.

The affidavit supporting the search warrant was based on information supplied by an unnamed informant. ORS 133.545(3) provides in pertinent part:

“If an affidavit is based in whole or in part on hearsay, the affiant shall set forth facts bearing on any unnamed informant’s reliability and shall disclose, as far as possible, the means by which the information was obtained.”

The state concedes that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. HorwedelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SoudersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State v. Strubhar/JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. UrbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API