Ritter v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
This appeal presents us with two important questions of law.
The first question concerns the proper seope of a Cooksey plea-a plea of no contest, with the defendant preserving the right to raise a dispositive issue on appeal. Specifically, we are asked to decide whether a Cook-sey plea can be valid when the issue preserved for appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence at grand jury. Subject to a potential exception that we explain below, we hold that the sufficiency of the evidence at grand jury is not a dispositive issue, and thus it is not a proper basis for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Ryan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1995
- Miles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Iyapana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
- Ritter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
- Dow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
- Perez-Marquez v. LumbardoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Smith v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.