Legal Opinion

Ritter v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 19, 2001No. A-6983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

This appeal presents us with two important questions of law.

The first question concerns the proper seope of a Cooksey plea-a plea of no contest, with the defendant preserving the right to raise a dispositive issue on appeal. Specifically, we are asked to decide whether a Cook-sey plea can be valid when the issue preserved for appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence at grand jury. Subject to a potential exception that we explain below, we hold that the sufficiency of the evidence at grand jury is not a dispositive issue, and thus it is not a proper basis for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Ryan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1995
  5. Miles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Iyapana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  2. Ritter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
  3. Dow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  4. Perez-Marquez v. LumbardoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  5. Smith v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API