Legal Opinion
Ritter v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided August 20, 2004No. A-8386PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Andy N. Ritter, a massage therapist working in Barrow, was convicted of second-degree sexual assault for engaging in sexual contact with four female clients. 1 Ritter appeals his convictions, arguing that the State failed to present sufficient evidence that the sexual contact occurred “without [the clients’] consent” as that phrase is defined in AS 11.41.470(8). Ritter also challenges various aspects of the superior court’s sentencing decision.
For the reasons explained here, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support Ritter’s convictions (except for one…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
- Juneby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Inga v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
- Milligan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
- Douglas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- Jimmy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- State of Alaska v. Thomas A. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.