Legal Opinion · Dissent

Antoinette Dumont v. Ford Motor Credit Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 15, 2009No. 08-60002Published

1DissentGraber, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

May a bankruptcy debtor “ride through” bankruptcy — retaining possession of her motor vehicle, so long as she continues to make regular loan payments; or must the debtor instead invoke one of the three options described in 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(2)(A)? Because of confusing and contradictory statutory text, courts have struggled for decades to discern congressional intent on the answer to that simple question. Indeed, before the enactment of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”), the circuit courts were split five to four. Five…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API