Legal Opinion

United States v. Orlando Bell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2010No. 09-1234UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Orlando Bell appeals his sentence as both procedurally and substantively unreasonable following his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § § 846 and 841(a)(1). Defendant is the recipient of a heart transplant and has a shortened life expectancy that makes it likely he will die before being released from prison. For the following reasons, the district court’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History

A seven-count indictment was issued against Defendant and four co-conspirators on May 22, 2008.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Spears v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Jason MizeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Jordan WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API