Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Angel

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Jesse V. Palmer and another against Charles H. Angel and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, entered on the report of a referee, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHerrick, J.

Prior to the 1st day of May, 1863, the Batten-kill Knitting Company was the owner of certain real estate and. lands in the county of Washington, through which lands and real estate runs a stream known as the “Battenkill.” Across such stream there was a dam and a mill pond created by said, dam, the water power from which was used to operate the mill pond owned by the Battenkill Knitting Company. On the 1st day of May, 1863, the Battenkill Knitting Company executed and. delivered to Moses Ballon and Horatio G-. Craig, and their assigns, a deed to a portion of the aforesaid premises owned and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Groat v. . MoakNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Cromwell v. . SeldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Mudge v. . SalisburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Wakely v. . DavidsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dexter Sulphite Pulp & Paper Co. v. Jefferson Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Stannards Water Co. v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API