Legal Opinion

Wakely v. . Davidson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The right of the defendants to use the water power for driving the machinery of their foundry was subordinate as respects the carding and fulling mill privileges of the plaintiff, such as they really…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Comstock v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Hall v. Sterling Iron & Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Chautauqua County Federation of Sportsmens Club, Inc. v. CaflischAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Palmer v. AngelNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hall v. Sterling Iron & Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API