Legal Opinion

Kollman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 26, 1998No. A97A1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Bernice Kollman guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent that it is less safe to drive (OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (1)). Kollman appeals, asserting that the trial court erred by admitting Intoxilyzer 5000 test results without a proper foundation and that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict. We disagree and' affirm Kollman’s conviction.

1. Kollman asserts that the trial court erred in admitting the Intoxilyzer 5000 test results because there was no evidence the arresting officer informed her of her implied consent rights. See OCGA §§…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Tanner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Morrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Shelton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Rylee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Hammontree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API