Scott v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
A jury found Jami Scott and his co-defendant, Jacob Jordan, guilty of burglary, two counts of aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. Scott appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial on the bases of ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct. Because we find no reversible error, we affirm.
On appeal, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict, and an appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. We determine whether the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ledford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Kapua v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Fairclough v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.