Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 2000No. A99A1775PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

A jury found Jami Scott and his co-defendant, Jacob Jordan, guilty of burglary, two counts of aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. Scott appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial on the bases of ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct. Because we find no reversible error, we affirm.

On appeal, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict, and an appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. We determine whether the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Ledford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Kapua v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Fairclough v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API