Legal Opinion

Hackett v. State ex rel. Martindale

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1888No. 13,083PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The proceeding appealed from in this case was an action in the name of the State, on the relation of Jesse L. Martindale, a commissioner of drainage of Fulton county, against Thomas P. Hackett, the appellant, to enforce alleged liens resulting from assessments for the construction of a ditch upon three forty-acre tracts of land belonging to the latter.

The complaint averred that the appellant and one Isaac H. Kersey, on the 12th day of August, 1882, filed their petition iu the office of the clerk of the Fulton Circuit Court, praying for the drainage of certain lands therein described,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pickering v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McMullen v. State ex rel. KendleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Indianapolis & Cumberland Gravel Road Co. v. State ex rel. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Deegan v. State ex rel. Stoddard, Drainage CommissionerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Tucker v. SellersIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Oliver v. Monona CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Bass v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API