Legal Opinion

Voorhees v. Unger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1914Published

Appeal by the defendants, Harry Unger and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 30th day of July, 1914, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the Kings County Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

This action was originally commenced against Harry Unger, G-ussie Unger, his wife, Sarah Krane and three other defendants to set aside several conveyances made by said Harry Unger at different times to said several defendants as fraudulent and void as against plaintiffs, who subsequently became judgment creditors of said Harry Unger. Upon two previous occasions a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs has been reversed by this court for insufficient proof. (Voorhees v. Unger, 142 App. Div. 543; S. C., 151 id. 35.) The action now appears to have been abandoned against all of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kerker v. . LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Wadleigh v. WadleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Barr v. SofranskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Upson v. Mount Morris BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Voorhees v. UngerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API