Barr v. Sofranski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep abate appeals "by the defendants, Eva Sofranski and. another, from certain parts of a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintifE, entered in the office.of the clerk of the county of Rew York on the 1st day of April, 1908, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Rew York Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
■ This is an appeal from a judgment adjudging that the- assignment of a bond and mortgage by Newman Sofranski, the bankrupt, to Eva Sofranski, his wife, and an assignment by Eva Sofranski to the defendant Solomon are void and fraudulent as against the bankrupt’s creditors. The court found that in August, 1905, Newman Sofrauski owned certain real property in the city of New York described in the complaint; that lie sold this property, and on the 15th day of August, 1905, he received from the purchaser $20,000 in cash and a bond and mortgage for $26,500, payable to the bankrupt and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hankinson v. . VantineNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cohen v. BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Voorhees v. UngerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- In re CalviDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1911
- In re the Estate of BehnckeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- Voorhees v. UngerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.