Legal Opinion
Reckart v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 26, 2010No. 13-09-00179-CRPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice BENAVIDES.
Appellant, Richard Michael Reckart, appeals his conviction for continuous sexual abuse of a young child, a first-degree felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.02 (Vernon Supp.2009). Reckart was sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice— Institutional Division and was assessed court costs. By seven issues, Reckart argues that: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of alleged extraneous acts; (2) the trial court’s admission of uncorroborated outcry testimony violated his right to due process; (3) the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Casey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
- Bruce Alan McMillian v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- Philip Wade Ellison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Navarro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.