Staver v. Milwaukee County
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
WEDEMEYER, PJ.
¶ 1. Harry T. Staver appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Milwaukee County. Staver claims: (1) the trial court should have struck the County's trial court summary judgment brief because it did not contain record references or citations to legal authority; (2) he is entitled, as a matter of law, to interest on the retroactive pension payment he received; (3) he is entitled, as a matter of law, to a lump-sum refund payment, plus interest, for the health insurance premiums he paid from the time of his retirement until the time it was determined that he was to receive…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Laycock v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 2169, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23950aCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- California Wine Asso. v. Wisconsin Liquor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ludyjan v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- Air Engineering, Inc. v. Industrial Air Power, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
- Amundson v. Slaton (In Re Slaton)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Bushard v. ReismanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011