Legal Opinion

People v. Curtis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 15, 2006No. 3-03-1029PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Brien

Defendant Timothy Curtis was charged with three counts of aggravated battery. Following a jury trial, Curtis was found guilty of two counts and sentenced to concurrent three-year terms of imprisonment. He appealed, claiming that his due process rights were violated when he was required to wear a stun belt without the required hearing and that his convictions violated one-act, one-crime principles. We find that Curtis waived the due process issue by failing to object to the use of restraints and that one of his convictions must be vacated pursuant to one-act, one-crime principles. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. CrespoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. KruegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. People v. GarciaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API