Legal Opinion
Gulesian v. Richardson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 3, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
This case is not properly here on report under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 111. There has-been no verdict, and there has been no finding or agreement as to the facts. The only language of § 111 under which any contention might be made that the case could be reported is that found in the second sentence, under which the trial judge may report if he “is of opinion that an interlocutory . . . order made by him ought to be determined by the full court before any further proceedings in the trial court.” There was no interlocutory order within the meaning of the statute.
The action is against the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Burlen v. ShannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Fleming v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Giedrewicz v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rines v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Scaccia v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- John Gilbert Jr. Co. v. C. M. Fauci Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- VautierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Zelman v. KillionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.