State v. East
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
The state appeals from an order dismissing a complaint for "failure to state facts,” by which the district court apparently meant failure to allege sufficient facts to state a crime.
In addition to other requisite allegations, the complaint alleged that the defendants did "offer and agree to engage in sexual conduct in return for a fee.”
ORS 167.007(l)(a) provides that a person commits the crime of prostitution if he "offers or agrees to engage in sexual conduct * * * in return for a fee.”
It is elementary that an instrument which charges a crime in the statutory language is generally sufficient…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WaldoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. StrandquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982