Legal Opinion

State v. East

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 1977No. DA 136432, CA 8810PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The state appeals from an order dismissing a complaint for "failure to state facts,” by which the district court apparently meant failure to allege sufficient facts to state a crime.

In addition to other requisite allegations, the complaint alleged that the defendants did "offer and agree to engage in sexual conduct in return for a fee.”

ORS 167.007(l)(a) provides that a person commits the crime of prostitution if he "offers or agrees to engage in sexual conduct * * * in return for a fee.”

It is elementary that an instrument which charges a crime in the statutory language is generally sufficient…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WaldoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State v. StrandquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API