Legal Opinion
Pittman v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 28, 2011No. S10A1436PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NAHMIAS, Justice.
Bobby and Judy Pittman (“the Pittmans”) and their corporation, Hungry Jacks Foods, Inc. d/b/a Jumping Jacks Convenience Store (“Jumping Jacks”), appeal from the trial court’s order that, among other things, appointed a receiver to take control of the assets of and to manage Jumping Jacks. We affirm.
On March 8, 2010, the State brought this action under the *590Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. See OCGA § 16-14-1 et seq. The complaint alleged that the Pittmans and Jumping Jacks (“the defendants”) had engaged in numerous illegal acts of commercial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Head v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- State v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Georgia Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Newnan HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Hall v. LanceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Ebon Foundation, Inc. v. OatmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Patel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Boyd v. Johngalt Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Western Sky Financial, LLC v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Patel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.