Legal Opinion

George Dixon, Inc. v. Central Motors Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1938No. File No. 6530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The plaintiff sold to tbe defendant a truck on a partial cask payment and eighteen deferred monthly payments, under tbe terms of a “Conditional Sale Contract,” wbicb provided, among other things:

“Title to said property is reserved by seller and shall not pass to the purchaser until said amount is fully paid in cash;” that if the purchaser defaulted in his payments “the full amount, shall, at the election of the seller, be immediately due and payable, and purchaser shall be deemed in default;”
“Time is of the essence of this contract, and if the purchaser default in complying with the terms…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Stewart & Holmes Drug Co. v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Angell v. EggerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Glisson v. Heggie Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. McBryan v. Universal Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. B.R.T. v. Executive Director of Social Service Board of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McLean v. UnderdalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Mielcarek v. RiskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. PfeiffleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API