Legal Opinion

Medford Corp. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 1992No. 89-21043; CA A69499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant has established that his employment while employer was self-insured was a material contributing cause of his left wrist carpal tunnel condition and that the claim is compensable as an occupational disease under ORS 656.802(l)(c).

Before July 1, 1988, employer was insured by SAIF. After that date, it became self-insured. Claimant, who worked as a machinist, began complaining about hand problems in February, 1988. In May, 1988, he filed a claim for carpal tunnel syndrome in the right wrist, which SAIF…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Aetna Casualty Co. v. AschbacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Papen v. Willamina Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Johnson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. SAIF Corp. v. CessnunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API