Legal Opinion

Succession of Daigle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

from tlie District Court of the Parish of St. Landry, Simon, J.

1Opinion of the CourtDuffel, J.

This is an opposition to the homologation of the account!presented by the administrators.

1.The administrators arc sought to be made liable for all the debts due the estate, according to the proces-verbal of the inventory.

The District Judge, on this branch of the case, ordered the administrators to account for one-half of the items 67, 70 and 75 of the inventory. The administrators ask that those items be rejected; and Martin, one of the opponents, contends that the administrators should be condemned to account for all the remaining claims of the estate.

The case has been presented in such a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benton v. Abner C.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Danks v. MaherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Marshall v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Pillsbury Co. v. HuenefeldDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API