Legal Opinion

United States v. Taverna

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 31, 2003No. 03-5018PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

A grand jury indicted Defendant David Taverna for possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), (b). The district court denied Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence law enforcement seized from his vehicle. Defendant entered a conditional guilty plea and reserved the right to appeal. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2). On appeal, Defendant claims the search of his vehicle violated the Fourth Amendment. Defendant also claims the absence of a verbatim transcript of a videotape played at the suppression hearing denied him a meaningful…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. United States v. Schmitt DegassoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Ysasi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  4. United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Apodaca v. State of New Mexico Adult Probation & ParoleDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API