State v. Bradford, 08ca3053 (4-10-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
{¶ 1} Pele K. Bradford appeals the Ross County Common Pleas Court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Bradford contends that because he is not the actual defendant named in the indictment, the common pleas court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. Finally, Bradford claims the trial court erred by ignoring "nunc pro tunc" language that he included in a Uniform Commercial Code Financing Statement. Because Bradford offered no relevant or cogent facts that he was not the actual defendant named in the indictment, and because the trial court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ColeOhio Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HeidOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. SlagleOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. SealOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bradley v. HooksOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.