Legal Opinion
United States v. BCCI Holdings
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 26, 1997No. Crim. A. No. 91-0655 (JHG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Upon consideration of the Government’s Motion for the Imposition of Sanctions Relating to the L-Claim of Lee and Patricia Scarfone (“Motion for Sanctions”), the motion will be denied for failure to follow the procedural requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(c)(1)(A).
In its Motion for Sanctions against attorney Gerard Roble and/or against the law firm of Merkle & Magri, P.A., the United States correctly notes that counsel for the petitioners have filed four petitions under 18 U.S.C. § 1963(l)-each of which has been denied on ground that, as general creditors of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elliott v. TiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- United States v. Bcci Holdings (Luxembourg), SaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- United States v. Bcci Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A., General Secretariat of the Organization of American StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc. v. Old Republic Surety Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- DeGiacomo v. MorrisonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
- Fitzgerald Motors, Inc. v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.