Legal Opinion
Pulphus v. Ayers
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 14, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2017-0310PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Before the Court is [7] plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The plaintiffs in this case are David Pulphus, a student artist from Missouri’s First Congressional District, and William Clay, the congressional representative for that district. Pul-phus’s painting was selected to represent the district in the 2016 Congressional Art Competition, and was hung in the Cannon Tunnel, part of the U.S. Capitol complex, in June 2016 with the other winning artwork. The painting was removed several months later by defendant Stephen…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Raven v. SajetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Little v. Llano CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
- David Pulphus v. Stephen AyersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- English v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Frederickson v. San Diego County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.