In re Voluntary Assignment of Hoge
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 49, Oct. T., 1898, by Bazel Gordon, from order of C. P. Greene Co., Jan. T., 1890, No. 7, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to report of A. A. Purman, Esq., auditor. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report by Mestrezat, P. J., of the 14th judicial district, specially presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Dean,
In the year 1885 Lantz, Braden, Spragg, Montgomery, Dowlin, Inghram, and this assignor, Abner Hoge, seven in all, residents of Greene county, formed a parol partnership to buy and sell real estate and to buy, raise, feed and sell cattle; each was to have an equal interest in the business and share equally in profits and losses. By consent of all, Lantz, who was cashier of the Farmers’ and Drovers’ National Bank of Waynesburg, acted as general manager of the business. There was no fixed partnership capital. Six of the partners, leaving out Inghram, *530borrowed on their…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Ramsey, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Schantz v. ClemmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Herron v. HerronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- First National Bank of Windsor v. Foin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1926