Legal Opinion

Carson v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 10, 1932No. 12,775Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

J. Harry Carson, plaintiff in error, will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff, and Rollie W. Bradford, Erie O. Kistler and the Bradfor'd-Robinson Printing- Company, a corporation, defendants in error, will be referred to as defendants, or as Bradford, Kistler or the printing company. Plaintiff brought an action to recover a money judgment against defendants; defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint was sustained; plaintiff elected to stand upon his amended complaint and thereupon judgment was rendered in favor of defendants. Plaintiff prosecutes this writ assigning as error…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane v. MorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Roose v. GoveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  3. Ross v. NicholsColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Jenkins v. Gold Dollar Mining & Milling Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API