Dorival v. State

We affirm the defendant’s conviction in all respects. See U.S. v. Wilson, 421 U.S. 309, 95 S.Ct. 1802, 44 L.Ed.2d 186 (1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.830 (1999). However, as the State concedes, there was a scrivener’s error in the written judgment which stated that the defendant was found guilty of direct criminal contempt rather than indirect criminal contempt. Accordingly, we affirm and remand to the lower court to correct this error.

Affirmed and remanded.