United States v. ONE DEVICE, MORE OR LESS, ETC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LUONGO, District Judge.
This is a suit under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as Act. Section number references will be to U.S.C.A. section numbers.) The United States filed a libel in rem (§ 334) seeking to condemn as misbranded (§ 352 (a) and § 352(f)) a certain article of device known as an Ellis Micro-Dynameter. George Morris, a chiropractor, from whom the device was seized has filed a claim thereto seeking its return.
Before me is the motion of the United States for summary judgment under Fed. R.Civ.P. 56, as amended, contending…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fleischman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels, More or Less, Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar, Douglas Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Device Labeled "Cameron Spitler Amblyo-Syntonizer"District Court, D. Nebraska · 1966
- United States v. 216 Bottles, More or LessDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965
- United States v. An Article Of FoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. an Article . . . Acu-Dot . . .District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- United States v. An Article of FoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.