Legal Opinion

United States v. ONE DEVICE, MORE OR LESS, ETC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1963No. 54 of 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUONGO, District Judge.

This is a suit under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as Act. Section number references will be to U.S.C.A. section numbers.) The United States filed a libel in rem (§ 334) seeking to condemn as misbranded (§ 352 (a) and § 352(f)) a certain article of device known as an Ellis Micro-Dynameter. George Morris, a chiropractor, from whom the device was seized has filed a claim thereto seeking its return.

Before me is the motion of the United States for summary judgment under Fed. R.Civ.P. 56, as amended, contending…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Fleischman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels, More or Less, Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar, Douglas Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Device Labeled "Cameron Spitler Amblyo-Syntonizer"District Court, D. Nebraska · 1966
  2. United States v. 216 Bottles, More or LessDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965
  3. United States v. An Article Of FoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. an Article . . . Acu-Dot . . .District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
  5. United States v. An Article of FoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API