Legal Opinion
United States v. 216 Bottles, More or Less
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 21, 1965No. 64-M-900PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
This is an action in rem arising under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. (“Act”), instituted by the Government by (1) filing a Libel of Information in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, for the purpose of seizing certain cartoned bottles of an article labeled in part as “Sudden Change by Lanolin Plus” and also certain pieces of promotional material, and (2) obtaining a decree of condemnation of the seized article upon the ground that the same is a “drug” within the meaning of 21 U.S.C.A. § 321(g)(3)…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Four Hundred & Forty-Three Cans of Frozen Egg Product v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Aktiebolaget Vargos v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- United States v. NYSCO Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- United States v. 354 BULK CARTONS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. PaceDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- United States v. An Article of Drug Consisting of 30 Individually Cartoned JarsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967
- United States v. $5,372.85 United States Coin and CurrencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- United States v. United States v. Article Consisting of 216 Individually Cartoned Bottles, More or Less, of an Article Labeled in Part: Sudden ChangeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.